In the Conversations with God trilogy, there is a really interesting entry about the devil and its origin. Basically, there really is no devil. We simply just invented it. How and why did this happen? Well, read on…
In discussing the origin of the “devil”, let us begin by looking at your yesterdays. I would speak to you of power, and of strength — and the difference between the two. I would also chat with you about this Satan figure you have invented, how and why you invented him, and how you decided that your God was a “He”, and not a “She”.
Now, let us go back to the time when your society reorganized itself. That is when men became the dominant species, and then decided it was inappropriate to display emotions — or in some cases to even have them.
What do You mean, “when society reorganized itself”? What are we talking about here?
In an earlier part of your history, you lived on this planet in a matriarchal society. Then there was a shift, and the patriarchy emerged. When you made that shift, you moved away from expressing your emotions. You labeled it “weak” to do so. It was during this period that the males also invented the devil, and the masculine God.
Males invented the devil?
Yes. Satan was essentially a male invention. Ultimately, all of society went along with it, but the turning away from emotions, and the invention of an “Evil One”, was all part of a male rebellion against the matriarchy, a period during which women ruled over everything from their emotions. They held all governmental posts, all religious positions of power, all places of influence in commerce, science, academia, healing.
What power did men have?
None. Men had to justify their existence, for they had very little importance beyond their ability to fertilize female eggs and move heavy objects. They were very much like worker ants and bees. They did the heavy physical labor, and made sure that children were produced and protected.
It took men hundreds of years to find and to create a larger place for themselves in the fabric of their society. Centuries passed before males were even allowed to participate in their clan’s affairs; to have a voice or a vote in community decisions. They weren’t considered by women to be intelligent enough to understand such matters.
Centuries more passed before they could think of actually holding the positions of leadership for which they finally had the chance to vote. Other posts of influence and power within their culture were similarly denied them.
When males finally obtained positions of authority within society, when they at last rose above their former place as baby-makers and virtual physical slaves, it is to their credit that they did not even turn the tables on women, but have always accorded females the respect, power, and influence that all humans deserve, regardless of gender.
I like your sense of humor about this. I really do. Shall I go on?
Okay, please go on…
Let’s get back to our narrative. But before we go on about the invention of “the devil”, let us talk a bit about power. Because this is what the invention of Satan was all about.
You’re going to make the point now that men have all the power in today’s society, right? Let me jump ahead of You and tell You why I think this happened.
You said that in the matriarchal period, men were very much like worker bees serving the queen bee. You said they did the difficult physical work, and made sure that children were produced and protected. And I felt like saying, “So what’s changed? That’s what they do now!” And I’ll bet that many men would probably say that not a great deal has changed — except that men have extracted a price for maintaining their “thankless role”. They do have more power.
Actually, most of the power.
Okay, most of the power. But the irony I see here is that both genders think they are handling the thankless tasks, while the other is having all the fun. Men resent the women who are attempting to take back some of their power, because men say they’ll be damned if they’ll do all that they do for the culture, and not at least have the power it takes to do it.
Women resent men keeping all the power, saying they’ll be damned if they’ll continue doing for the culture what they do, and still remain powerless.
You’ve analyzed it correctly. And both men and women are damned to repeat their own mistakes in an endless cycle of self-inflicted misery until one side or the other gets that life is not about power, but about strength. And until both see that it’s not about separation, but unity. For it is in unity that inner strength exists, and in the separation that it dissipates, leaving one feeling weak, and powerless — and hence, struggling for power.
I tell you this: Heal the rift between you, end the illusion of separation, and you shall be delivered back to the source of your inner strength. That is where you will find true power. The power to do anything. The power to be anything. For the power to create is derived from the inner strength that is produced through unity.
This is true of the relationship between you and your God — just as it is remarkably true of the relationship between you and your fellow humans.
Stop thinking of yourself as separate, and all the true power that comes from the inner strength of unity is yours — as a worldwide society, and as an individual part of that whole — to wield as you wish.
Yet remember this: Power comes from inner strength. Inner strength does not come from raw power. In this, most of the world has it backwards.
Power without inner strength is an illusion. Inner strength without unity is a lie. A lie that has not served the race, but that has nevertheless deeply embedded itself into your race consciousness. For you think that inner strength comes from individuality and from separateness, and that is simply not so. Separation from God and from each other is the cause of all your dysfunction and suffering. Still, separation continues to masquerade as strength, and your politics, your economics, and even your religions have perpetuated the lie.
This lie is the genesis of all wars and all the class struggles that lead to war; of all animosity between races and genders, and all the power struggles that lead to animosity; of all personal trials and tribulations, and all the internal struggles that lead to tribulations.
Still, you cling to the lie tenaciously, no matter where you’ve seen it lead you — even as it has led you to your own destruction.
Now I tell you this: Know the truth, and the truth shall set you free.
There is no separation. Not from each other, not from God, and not from anything that is.
Act as if you are separate from nothing, and no one, and you will heal your world tomorrow.
This is the greatest secret of all time. It is the answer for which man has searched for millenia. It is the solution for which he has worked, the revelation for which he has prayed.
Act as if you were separate from nothing, and you heal the world.
Understand that it is about power with, not power over.
Thank You. I got that. So getting back, first it was females who had power over males, and now it is the other way around. And males invented the devil in order to wrest this power away from the female tribal or clan leaders?
Yes. They used fear, because fear was the only tool they had.
Again, not much has changed. Men do that to this day. Sometimes even before appeals to reason are tried, men use fear. Particularly if they are the bigger men; the stronger men. (Or the bigger or stronger nation). Sometimes it seems actually ingrained in men. It seems cellular. Might is right. Strength is power.
Yes. This has been the way since the overturn of the matriarchy.
How did it get that way?
This is what this short history is all about.
What men had to do to gain control during the matriarchal period was not to convince women that men ought to be given more power over their lives, but to convince other men.
Life was, after all, going smoothly, and there were worse ways men could have to get through the day than simply doing some physical work to make themselves valued, and then have sex. So it was not easy for men, who were powerless, to convince other powerless men to seek power. Until they discovered fear.
Fear was the one thing women hadn’t counted on.
It began, this fear, with seeds of doubt, sown by the most disgruntled among the males. These were usually the least “desirable” of the men; the unmuscled, the unadorned — and hence, those to whom women paid the least attention.
And I’ll bet that because this was so, their complaints were discounted as the ravings of rage born of sexual frustration.
That is correct. Still, the disgruntled men had to use the only tool they had. So they sought to grow fear from the seeds of doubt. What if the women were wrong? they asked. What if their way of running the world wasn’t the best? What if it was, in fact, leading the whole society — all of the race — into sure and certain annihilation?
This is something many men could not imagine. After all, didn’t women have a direct line to the Goddess? Were they not, in fact, exact physical replicas of the Goddess? And was not the Goddess good?
The teaching was so powerful, so pervasive, that men had no choice but to invent a devil, a Satan, to counteract the unlimited goodness of the Great Mother imagined and worshipped by the people of the matriarchy.
How did they manage to convince anyone that there is such a thing as an “evil one”?
The one thing all of their society understood was the theory of the “rotten apple”. Even the women saw and knew from their experience that some children simply turned out “bad”, no matter what they did. Especially, as everybody knew, the boy children, who just could not be controlled.
So a myth was created.
One day, the Great Mother, the Goddess of Goddesses, brought forth a child who turned out to be not good. No matter what the Mother tried, the child would not do good. Finally, he struggled with his Mother for her very throne.
This was too much, even for a loving forgiving Mother. The boy was banished forever — but continued to show up in clever disguises and clever costumes, sometimes even posing as the Great Mother herself.
This myth laid the basis for men to ask, “How do we know the Goddess we worship is a Goddess at all? It could be the bad child, now grown up and wanting to fool us.”
By this device, men got other men to worry, then to be angry that women weren’t taking their worries seriously, then to rebel.
The being you now call Satan was thus created. It was not difficult to create a myth about a “bad child” and not difficult, either, to convince even the women of the clan of the possibility of the existence of such a creature. It was also not difficult getting anyone to accept that the bad child was male. Weren’t males the inferior gender?
This device was used to set up a mythological problem. If the “bad child” was male, if the “evil one” was masculine, who would be there to overpower him? Surely, not a feminine Goddess. For, said the men cleverly, when it came to matters of wisdom and insight, of clarity and compassion, of planning and thinking, no one doubted feminine superiority. Yet in matters of brute strength, was not a male needed?
Previously in Goddess mythology, men were merely consorts — companions to the females, who acted as servants and fulfilled their robust desire for lustful celebration of their Goddess magnificence.
But now a male was needed who could do more; a male who could also protect the Goddess and defeat the enemy. This transformation did not occur overnight, but across many years. Gradually, very gradually, societies began seeing the male consort as also the male protector in their spiritual mythologies, for now that there was someone to protect the Goddess from, such a protector was clearly needed.
It was not a major leap from male as protector to male as equal partner, now standing alongside the Goddess. The male God was created, and, for a while, Gods and Goddesses ruled mythology together.
Then, again gradually, Gods were given larger roles. The need for protection, for strength, began to supplant the need for wisdom and love. A new kind of love was born in these mythologies. A love which protects with brute force. But it was a love which also covets what it protects; which was jealous of its Goddesses; which now did not simply serve their feminine lusts, but fought and died for them.
Myths began to emerge of Gods of enormous power, quarreling over, fighting for, Goddesses of unspeakable beauty. And so was born the jealous God.
This is fascinating.
Wait. We’re coming to the end, but there’s just a little more.
It wasn’t long before the jealousy of the Gods extended not only to the Goddesses — but to all creations in all realms. We had better love Him, these jealous Gods demanded, and no other God — or else!
Since males were the most powerful species, and Gods were the most powerful of the males, there seemed little room for argument with this new mythology.
Stories of those who did argue, and lost, began to emerge. The God of wrath was born.
Soon, the whole idea of Diety was subverted. Instead of being the source of all love, it became the source of all fear.
A model of love which was largely feminine — the endlessly tolerant love of a mother for a child, and yes, even of a woman for her not-too-bright, but, after all, useful man, was replaced by the jealous, wrathful love of a demanding, intolerant God who would brook no interference, allow no insouciance, ignore no offense.
The smile of the amused Goddess, experiencing limitless love and gently submitting to the laws of nature, was replaced by the stern countenance of the not-so-amused God, proclaiming power over the laws of nature, and forevermore limiting love.
This is the God you worship today, and that’s how you got where you are now.
Amazing. Interesting. But what is the point in telling me all of this?
It is important for you to know that you’ve made it all up. The idea that “might is right”, or that “power is strength”, was born in your male-created theological myths.
The God of wrath and jealousy and anger was an imagining. Yet, something you imagined for too long, it became real. Some of you still consider it real today. Yet it has nothing to do with ultimate reality, or what’s really going on here.
And what is that?
What’s going on is that your soul yearns for the highest experience of itself it can imagine. It came here for that purpose — to realize itself (that is, make itself real) in its experience.
Then it discovered pleasures of the flesh — not just sex, but all manner of pleasure — and as it indulged in these pleasures, it gradually forgot the pleasures of the spirit.
These, too, are pleasures — greater pleasures than the body could ever give you. But the soul forgot this.
Hmm.. it seems we are now heading to another topic. Nonetheless, I believe this entry is long enough. So let us end here for now. Perhaps it is time to reflect on what has been written on this blog. For my next few entries, I will go to reflection on how I have been living my life knowing these truths.

29 comments
Comments feed for this article
July 17, 2007 at 5:56 pm
Unbeliever
Great master… I find the spam more interesting than what you are posting here…
July 18, 2007 at 3:08 pm
kris
hi master…it’s been a long time since my last comment
hi unbeliever…i think you’re the one who’s contradicting yourself. If you’re not interested in what the master posts about, then why do you keep on coming back?
Maybe behind all the show of unbelief, your soul still searches for answers, answers which you think you may be able to find in this blog…
Just my perspective, nothing personal…:)
July 18, 2007 at 6:08 pm
tonalc1
I knew I really should come back, when you promise me these post.
Can you please identify when in the civilized history did matriarchy prevail, or even just indications of it?
July 18, 2007 at 10:18 pm
justpassingby
http://www.saunalahti.fi/penelope/Feminism/matriarchy.html <– maybe this help?
July 24, 2007 at 9:27 pm
SELaplana
i simply believe what the Bible say about devil…
July 25, 2007 at 1:35 pm
spam
Unbeliever is right.
But really… what do you get from thinking about these things? So power is blah blah blah. Satan is blah blah blah. Then what?
Has it occurred to you that perhaps knowledge is the “Devil”?
July 25, 2007 at 1:49 pm
spam
Man created the “Devil” and therefore it exists. Man created this “God” or simply just defined him… so let me refer to him/Him as “God” as I refer to my Devil as “Devil”.
Man, unaware of his(or her, to satisfy the feminists) strength, thanks this “God” for creating a society and now, tries to blame this “Devil” who can possibly end it.
What happens next? Man moves on and builds another house.
Men are lonely. Men need to create this non-Man beings to share their home or give their life purpose.
Hahaha.
July 25, 2007 at 1:57 pm
Confused
I’m a little confused here.
First of all, you mentioned before that the Bible is incomplete. But are the things stated in it not true?
If it is true, then is it not that the Devil is stated in the Bible? In other words, it is the Bible that created the Devil. Is it not?
July 25, 2007 at 2:02 pm
Master Deryk
Hi Everyone!
First of all, thank you SELaplana for your input. =)
Next, I would like to thank spam for the wonderful insights. I thought about that too, “what do you get from thinking about these things?”… at first, it appears that we get nothing out of it.
On the other hand, by simply changing perspective, there are lots of things we can do. The world can be a better place if there are no “fears”. If there are no “right” and “wrong”, then wouldn’t it be “good” for everyone?
I guess… its all a matter of how we are going to our “ideal” world. Are we heading there? Or do we simply think we are heading there but is going the wrong way? =)
That is all. Thank you ^^
July 25, 2007 at 2:13 pm
Master Deryk
Hi Confused,
There had already been a lot of studies on the Bible, and what is “accepted” already is the fact that there are “pages”/”chapters” missing from the original Bible. These pages/chapters were said to be hidden by the Church simply because they believe it contains things/ideas that the people should not know.
Of course, there are “leaks” to these hidden pages/chapters. Perhaps you might want to consider checking out “The Secret” (there is a book and movie about it).
Going back to your question, “are the things stated in the Bible not true?” An open-minded answer would be… perhaps it is the translation that creates confusion. Think about it, can we thoroughly translate English to Chinese without losing a bit of the “actual message/idea”? Just that fact alone, it is quite safe to say that… the translation is one of the biggest issue.
Moreover, other than the translation, it is the interpretation that differs. We all “see” the same thing but “see it differently”. 5 men can look at the same elephant, and each would describe what they saw differently (yet none of them is wrong).
Now, you may side with me on this or not (either way is okay), but then… does it really matter if the “devil” exists? Or better yet, won’t the world be a better place if the “devil” does not exist (or that word/idea never existed). If there is no devil/evil… then there won’t be anyone dictating what is “right” and “wrong”. =)
Everything I have placed in this blog… is not about saying that I am right and everyone else is wrong. What I have placed here… is another perspective, another idea, another thought… that is directed to making the world a better place. =)
Thank you for posting =)
July 25, 2007 at 3:45 pm
Unbeliever
Quick question, is leaving questions unanswered, part of your plan in making the world a better place?
Just to prove my point, i’ll provide a summary of the comments:
*my questions from the other post
Status: Completely Ignored…
*tonalc1 – Can you please identify when in the civilized history did matriarchy prevail, or even just indications of it?
Status: Completely Ignored…
*justpassingby – Provided link about matriarchy
Status: Completely Ignored…
*Confused – you mentioned before that the Bible is incomplete. But are the things stated in it not true?
Status: Great Master answered: “the translation is one of the biggest issue… it is the interpretation that differs…”
Result: You just avoided the question… The question is: are the contents true or not? It is answerable by simply yes or no… true or false… As easy as that… Yet you attack the translation and interpretation of readers… The question is about the content, not the external factors great master…
You have proven yourself to be a master in evading questions and complicating matters… Perhaps it’s about time that you prove yourself a master in other things…
July 25, 2007 at 4:04 pm
Master Deryk
Hi Unbeliever,
I guess you didn’t understand… being a master is not about proving oneself, or proving anything at all. Have you read about Jesus proving Himself to be God? Didn’t he simply ignore the snake when the snake tempted him to convert rocks to bread? =)
I’ll tell you this… I need not answer all your questions just to prove myself. Because proving myself isn’t what’s important. What is important is that we be able to seek the answers ourselves. The answers have always been within us… yet why must we keep seeking it from outside ourselves?
There are millions of people like you and me, my friend. We live in this world seeking for answers. Yet if we are to find one, but doesn’t like it… then what do we do? Isn’t it natural that we search for one that we like? =)
Everything you see in this world is the Truth. We will only be able to see this Light if we start accepting everything and condemn nothing.
Everything you have said.. is the truth. Yet, everything I have said.. is also the truth. Two seemingly contradicting ideas, yet both are true at the same time. I’ll give you an example to illustrate this…
A glass of water can either be “half full” or “half empty”. Would you say that those who disagree that it is “half full” is wrong? And only those who say it is “half empty” is right? =) This may just be a simple example.. but the idea is more-or-less there.
We all have different perspectives, yet none can be proven “better” than the other. None can be proven as “true” nor “false”. It really doesn’t matter. =)
I’ll tell you this, my friend, if you have to prove yourself to everyone in this planet… you will never succeed. We simply have to respect the fact that we all think differently and none is better than the other. =)
July 25, 2007 at 8:06 pm
Unbeliever
“I guess you didn’t understand… being a master is not about proving oneself, or proving anything at all.”
- You quickly shifted to the topic of proving something… And as a result ignored the questions about the things posted here… well done great master…
“We will only be able to see this Light if we start accepting everything and condemn nothing.”
- This is far from your so-called open-mindedness… Being gullible sounds more like it… Ever heard of the term critical thinking?
“We live in this world seeking for answers. Yet if we are to find one, but doesn’t like it… then what do we do? Isn’t it natural that we search for one that we like?”
- You are like a brat just getting what you want… Then throwing away what you don’t like…
July 25, 2007 at 9:58 pm
rachelle
We all chose the things we do. We chose to believe this. We chose to criticize that. They (the answers?) all end up as our choices. ^_^ I’m guessing that is what Master meant by
“We live in this world seeking for answers. Yet if we are to find one, but doesn’t like it… then what do we do? Isn’t it natural that we search for one that we like?”
July 25, 2007 at 10:08 pm
tonalc1
Amazing, I get back, and a lot has been put up already!
Thanks for the link, read it, and it satisfied me up to some extent, though, if I may point out, the stories of the matriarchy there looked to scarce for me to account for why the Devil existed in the Western/Middle Eastern part of the world (where the Bible suppossed to have come from), when most of the stuff in the link were from the Pacific/East.
Or the fact that the Devil existed in many other disciplines, many of which were not matriarchal.
But don’t get me wrong, I’m satisfied enough to let it off the hook.
On another note, I don’t remember Jesus ignoring the Devil in the desert. On the *contrary*, He did give his replies, sensible replies that the “snake” was vanquished with his every try. Neither did any Scribe, Pharisee nor High Priest walked away without a parable or a reproach (which is still along the lines of what was asked, despite being a reproach)
But you’re right you don’t have to say anything to prove yourself. Though I think when you are engaged in an argument (for which effort is taken so no appeals or any fallacies take place), I think you owe the other person a reply (or so I think).
Yep, you don’t need to reply. Especially if you don’t have anything of equal weight to answer
July 25, 2007 at 11:33 pm
The Question
tonalc1 has a very good point there.
Tonalc1: “On the *contrary*, He did give his replies, sensible replies that the “snake” was vanquished with his every try.”
Jesus did not simply ignore the snake. However he in fact, aside from giving a sensible reply; he in turn used another Bible Verse against Satan.
“The devil said to him, ‘If you are the Son of God, tell this stone to become bread.’ Jesus answered, ‘It is written: ‘Man does not live on bread alone.’”
- Luke 4:3-4 (reference to Deut 8:3)
It is also contradictory for you, a person saying that the Devil does not exist, suddenly mentions the snake (which is Satan) being “ignored”. Thus recognizing its existence.
Deryk: “Yes, you are correct that I did not place any Biblical verses in my blog (yet).”
It is also disappointing for this phrase that you have mentioned last month has been nothing but an empty promise. You have been stating Biblical entries as examples at times. However you do not bother to state the verse that you have got the entry from. You run into the risk of having the reader simply believing what you have written. And also stating something that is wrong.
For someone who claims that he is like Jesus, I truly believe that twisting the Word is not what His Will is.
July 26, 2007 at 9:29 am
Unbeliever
“It is also contradictory for you, a person saying that the Devil does not exist, suddenly mentions the snake (which is Satan) being “ignored”. Thus recognizing its existence.”
- hahahaha I like that… Master of contradiction lives…
July 26, 2007 at 9:46 am
Master Deryk
In reference to what “The Question” said about what I answered before (Jesus “ignoring” the snake)… my apologies for the confusion. When I mentioned the word “ignored”, I meant that he did not bother accepting the challenge given to him.
Regarding the Biblical verses, again… didn’t I mention “yet”?
I was planning on getting there on my next reflection entries. =) Patience is a virtue.
On the note of your disappointments (Unbeliever and The Question), I have to say that I respect your opinions and really won’t do anything against your will (like forcing you to believe me). Like I said earlier, and will say it again: “When I want for you what you want for you, then I truly love you. On the other hand, when I want for you what I want for you, then I am loving myself through you.”
The purpose of my blog… is to spread a new Light. One that is yet to be “accepted”. It is very normal that something so new (some may call it powerful) will be heavily criticized and put down (didn’t Jesus went through the same thing before?).
If there is any request I would like to make… is that people stop judging the man who writes this, and simply focus on the message. If you find the message irrelevant/unimportant/useless… then so be it. My role is simply the messenger who spreads the message because it brings hope. =) If you cannot find hope, then you are free to look for it elsewhere. I won’t stop you. I won’t ever say that you are wrong, and I am the only “right”. In fact, only you know what is “best” for you.. =) You shape your own life, your own future, your own “destiny”.
(But of course, there will be more arguments on this.. because there are many who says: God has already set a course for you, thus there is really nothing you can do.) =)
July 26, 2007 at 9:55 am
Master Deryk
Now, since Unbeliever is one of our biggest contributor, he deserves a lot of credit. Let me face your “accusations” one-by-one, if I missed anything, feel free to inform me.
[1] I am a master of contradiction. Yes, thank you for showing me that. Thus I am “Who I Am” and “Who I Am Not”. Well, to be honest, aren’t we all like this? The only difference is.. most of us denies this reality.
Just a short example: Governments. Many governments around the world promotes human rights. Yet, what they do not show people is that.. they actually violate it on purpose and hide those in the dark. For as long as nobody “knows” it, then its as good as “not real”. Isn’t it? (Once again, this is very debatable.. yet how do we determine truth?)
Life is full of contradictions. Yet, the beauty can be seen when you look at both ends of the contradiction and find truth in both of them. =) You may not understand this, it really doesn’t matter. I can never “redeem” myself to someone who doesn’t want me “redeemed”. =) (This explains my silence towards Unbeliever, because I know that anything I say will be used against me.. so what’s the point in answering/explaining?)
[2] I am a brat who just gets what I want and throws what I don’t. Hmm.. aren’t we all the same? Well, it will be great if you can tell us something about your life wherein you are different from me. =) That will be nice.
Hmm.. those two are the ones on this page. But more or less, they pretty much summarizes how you see me (and perhaps, yourself as well). =)
July 26, 2007 at 11:08 am
Unbeliever
“If there is any request I would like to make…”
- nobody asked you…
“is that people stop judging the man who writes this, and simply focus on the message”
- there you go again with your observe-judge sermon…
- you just want your readers to focus on the message… So that they won’t see that the person preaching it is a hypocrite, because you never practice what you preach…
“This explains my silence towards Unbeliever, because I know that anything I say will be used against me.. so what’s the point in answering/explaining?”
- it’s simple… I’m trying to knock some sense into your head… But it seems to be hopeless… so what’s the point in trying?
July 27, 2007 at 7:41 am
rachelle
“you just want your readers to focus on the message… So that they won’t see that the person preaching it is a hypocrite, because you never practice what you preach…”
–> does that mean you’ve met Master in real life??? O.O
July 27, 2007 at 7:56 am
Master Deryk
Thanks rachelle. You woke up pretty early today. =)
This is what I meant by people so quick to judge. We only see from one perspective an event/a person/a situation and then, we think we already know it all. I’m not saying this is “right” or “wrong”… its just that, it is this exact attitude that hinders many of us from focusing on the “important” matters in life (loving, respect, being happy).
Most of us loves blaming things on others as well. If something did not go the way we want it to, we just have to blame it on something (a person, the devil, or even God). Afterwards, we start denying this observable fact, and say something like: “You think you already know it all?” (etc etc) =)
Anyway, the bottomline is… we simply have to realize that… it is the message that truly matters (not the messenger). If we all keep on scrutinizing the messenger over the message, then we simply just cannot move forward (because no one can please everybody). Again, (sorry The Question.. I don’t know which verses states this), Jesus himself was crucified by the people he loved so much (he did not even “sin” against them).
Bottomline of this message: You cannot please everybody. That is why… pleasing everybody does not really matter. What matters is… respect and love for each other. =) If you respect others, they will respect you as well. What you give to others, you give to yourself. =)
July 27, 2007 at 7:03 pm
Unbeliever
I wouldn’t wish to meet the great master in real life… I would just be seeing even greater hypocrisy if that were to be the case…
Can’t you even see that by the way he speaks in his comments, he doesn’t even reflect the messages that he preaches? Master… see how many bottomlines you have, just be quick to the point… You just keep repeating the same things then end up contradicting yourself…
July 27, 2007 at 7:44 pm
Bored
This battle between Unbeliever and Master will never stop. It is starting to get boring. O_o *yawn*
All I see is Unbeliever spamming and getting away with it. X_X *boo*
I agree with kris that Unbeliever is enjoying here as contrast to what he claims. T_T *So sad*
I personally do not believe 100% the information here. But I find Master’s comments interesting. I will be sticking around to kill time. More power to ‘rachelle’, ‘tonalc1′, ‘The Question’, and ‘Master Deryk’ +__+ *more “interesting” topics pls.*
July 30, 2007 at 1:35 pm
Master Deryk
Hi everyone,
I’m back! =) Well, not for long. I will be away for a while and will be back 2nd week of August. The reflection entry will start by then.
Hi Unbeliever,
Thanks, I guess. =)
Hi Bored,
Thanks also. I’ll keep this blog alive once I get back. God bless! =)
August 25, 2007 at 4:34 am
Mistress
the article about the Great Goddess and the ‘Devil’ by a Master Deryk is complete utter rubbish.
August 26, 2007 at 1:34 am
Marc Gilmet
I thought the concept was exceptionally interesting, although I am not sure about the whole “maternity was in charge first then males took over.” Even at that, I am not sure that it matters too much because I would like to believe we/God is probably both sexes rolled into one and yet, at the same time, I buy that much of how we think involves our views as “separate” beings rather than the singular being.
One thing I did note is that the writer did not give a time line for the male takeover. Did this occur prior to the invention of writing? I am just curious.
August 26, 2007 at 12:52 pm
Master Deryk
Hi Marc,
Regarding the time line, unfortunately there is none. But I also agree with the idea that “it does not matter too much if indeed maternity was in charge first before the males took over”. To me, what is most important here is the idea that there is really no such thing as the devil. And that we simply created “it” in order to have a scapegoat of some sort.
September 9, 2007 at 11:11 pm
Marc Gilmet
ya…good point. The whole gender thing is a side issue. It is easier and more logical to believe that the devil was created to serve our own ends, be it power, control, or whatever. Quite clever actually…;-))